> People (and I include myself) are simply unwilling to accept that their lives have to change The real tragedy is that a fair amount of this change would make

> People (and I include myself) are simply unwilling to accept that their lives have to change The real tragedy is that a fair amount of this change would make people's lives better. For example, more walkable human scale communities, less combustion in vehicles and homes, more comfortable, healthier, and cheaper to operate homes, reduced air pollution for communities in the vicinity of power plants and industrial facilities. But on the other hand, yes smaller houses and cars, less meat, etc are hard to adjust to. > Barring some of unforeseen technical miracle the next 20-30 years are going to get increasingly grim. Disagree on that. The technologies we need are all pretty ready or close. It's about bending cost curves and the rate of deployment.