We also saw that with image synthesis. As you can imagine, if you scrap the internet for content, any model will tend to generate "controversial" images itself.

We also saw that with image synthesis. As you can imagine, if you scrap the internet for content, any model will tend to generate "controversial" images itself. An example is stable diffusion. Of course there is interest in making it commercially viable or just SFW in general. The 2.0 model version was lobotomized to not create anything "bad". As a result it was pretty useless. There was a successor version 2.1 that did it to a lesser degree, but the old 1.5 model was still more flexible. Many user prefer it even if the training data for 2.0+ had higher resolution images. There are new models were we have to see. But I think the overall tendency to lobotomize AI is pretty negative for its overall development. There should always be an option for the educated user. Sadly, unlike with LLM, it is harder to circumvent these restriction by changing your input.