4 ms·

But if the network is as a whole pushing full capacity, spreading out the load won't help because there's barely any slack to spread it into. You could get 4x r

• dylan604 3y ago
  Let's face it, we don't really need 24fps+ footage from the moon. Nothing is changing on a timescale that would be interesting. Even if the cameras are on a rover, take high quality panoramic 360 stereoscopic images every time the rover moves to a new destination. During the course of the next move, it can be uploading that data. But who are we kidding? A group of internet forum nerds coming up with something that the people at NASA/JPL/ESA/etc haven't already considered?
  • justin66 3y ago
    > Let's face it, we don't really need 24fps+ footage from the moon. Nothing is changing on a timescale that would be interesting. NASA's funding problems would compound if they took an attitude this naïve during what is largely a PR mission.
    • dylan604 3y ago
      I'm naive? What do you expect to see? Just take a still and apply some noise to it, and it'll look "just like" video. I don't know what you're on about, but there's no people in these images. If these were manned landings with expeditions, then great, let's have some video. But that's not what we're talking about. And you know this
      • deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]
      • placesalt 3y ago
        There are plans to send people back to the moon.