I won't die on this hill but the point article makes is slippery slope. 2200 survey participants -> 42% have dogs -> 56% of (some other group ?) dog owners opp

I won't die on this hill but the point article makes is slippery slope. 2200 survey participants -> 42% have dogs -> 56% of (some other group ?) dog owners oppose rabies vaccination -> 37% of (still the same group ?) dog owners think vaccines cause dog autism -> dog autism doesnt exist -> all dog owners who oppose vaccines are insane because dog autism doesn't exist.