3 ms·
Even more basic, wouldn't that just make the split 3:2 instead of 2:3 (aka, the same thing)? I don't think we can give each server 2.5 connections (though that
by saurik 3y ago
Even more basic, wouldn't that just make the split 3:2 instead of 2:3 (aka, the same thing)? I don't think we can give each server 2.5 connections (though that would be cool!) ;P.
- saghm 3y agoYeah, I guess what I meant is that forcing one connection to swap back and forth at some interval would make it 1:1 on "average" over a longer period of time, but it seems presumptuous to think that would perform better, since the cost of having to re-establish a connection each time and then potentially communicate any "state" that would be needed to resume from whatever context was being executed before doesn't seem like a good tradeoff (not to mention the huge increase in complexity of the logic the client would need to have to handle this).