Thanks. I'm familiar with Oil, and appreciate its gradual approach to compatibility, but I'm not the target user for it. > It's designed for programmers who kn

Thanks. I'm familiar with Oil, and appreciate its gradual approach to compatibility, but I'm not the target user for it. > It's designed for programmers who know Python, JavaScript, or Ruby, but avoid shell. I know Python and JS, but I don't avoid shell. :) I differ with the Oil authors in that I don't think that my shell should be a programming language. The warts in shell scripting are not insurmountable, and for the simple use cases that it's meant to be used for, it's perfectly adequate. For anything beyond a comfortable level of complexity, I reach for a proper programming language. This approach has served me well over the years, and I don't experience any of the compatibility drawbacks of using an alternative shell, or maintenance drawbacks of using a niche shell-oriented programming language.