Yep you definitely gave me the benefit of the doubt by pretending that I meant that the people didn't get sick. Not simply that the "implicit subsidies" is fict

Yep you definitely gave me the benefit of the doubt by pretending that I meant that the people didn't get sick. Not simply that the "implicit subsidies" is fictional. Good work. Solid discourse. Thanks for playing. The government in this case gives nothing to the organisation. It simply doesnt take 65 billion that the author wants it to take. 5 billion they justify through tax breaks and the rest, they had to invent a class of subsidy that doesn't exist.