260 acres since 2021 really isn’t all that much - and they appear to have built housing on it - and we don’t know how much wetlands Indiana was losing per year

260 acres since 2021 really isn’t all that much - and they appear to have built housing on it - and we don’t know how much wetlands Indiana was losing per year before the rollback of protections. So this article fundamentally doesn’t give me enough information to make a decision on. This is a shame because id be inclined to side with protecting wetlands if I felt I could make a fair judgement. Instead what I know is that this website doesn’t like the rollback of protections, and the approximate maximal amount of water an acre of wetlands can hold. Thanks?