> they lost to their own perverse incentives This, IMO, is actually a good thing. If Google stayed really great (and thus dominant), there might be less incen

> they lost to their own perverse incentives This, IMO, is actually a good thing. If Google stayed really great (and thus dominant), there might be less incentive for new info retrieval and knowledge/"cognitive" tech. But the decay of Google makes consumers far more likely to experiment with alternatives. It sort of feels like the circle of (tech) life.