> As for your second sentence, the entire point of this article was that that's not true. 1. It was not my claim, I was just clarifying OP's claim. 2. "That's

> As for your second sentence, the entire point of this article was that that's not true. 1. It was not my claim, I was just clarifying OP's claim. 2. "That's not true" is an oversimplification. The article is basically saying that the software vehicles have to prevent damage from fast charging generally seems to work and minimal damage is occurred. But it still cautions against fast charging in high temperatures for example