4 ms·
It's not significantly different imo than some of the ideological stuff workplaces are pushing these days (diversity equity, blabla). Any work that has to be so
by version_five 3y ago
It's not significantly different imo than some of the ideological stuff workplaces are pushing these days (diversity equity, blabla). Any work that has to be something more than work is a problem imo.
- dullcrisp 3y ago[flagged]
- matrix_overload 3y agoIt distracts people from demanding real stuff like a higher salary or a better schedule, so mission accomplished.
- throwanem 3y agoI mean, so far nobody's tried to make getting a progress pride flag tattoo an condition of my employment. So there's that.
- IG_Semmelweiss 3y agoNo, but worst case if you decline the tatoo, you are fired. Compare that you the very real request to attend a HR struggle session, or sign an expression of support of X cause in a letter Now refuse. You, your friends, and your loved ones may end up fired AND, victims of a social media mob-lynching As you can see, the downside is quite dramatic in 1 of the 2 scenarios. Tattoo is suddenly looking quite good!
- omniglottal 3y agoThe tattooless are not a protected class.
- JohnFen 3y ago> You, your friends, and your loved ones may end up fired AND, victims of a social media mob-lynching When has this actually happened as a result of not attending some HR nonsense? And even if it did, getting fired seems like a much larger problem than being bad-mouthed online.
- Calamitous 3y ago> getting fired seems like a much larger problem than being bad-mouthed online. I’d argue the opposite: if I’m fired, I can get another job. If I’m bad-mouthed online, that can affect all future job prospects.