The report seems to exclusively focus on how the nuclear lobby works, and how allegedly all support for nuclear is either ideological or astroturfed. How this "

The report seems to exclusively focus on how the nuclear lobby works, and how allegedly all support for nuclear is either ideological or astroturfed. How this "undermines the EU's energy future" (I suppose closing the German nuclear fleet aided EU's energy future?) is not explained beyond a one-sentence reference: When, in 2019, the Rutte III government commissioned studies that concluded that nuclear energy would make reaching the 2050 climate targets more expensive, it organised, with input from the industrial lobby, a counter-study that claimed the opposite. Given that the German government knowingly lied about the viability of nuclear, claiming fuel rods could not be acquired fast enough after fuel-rod producers told them otherwise, and used such nonsense arguments like "Germany lacks natural gas, not electricity" (while gas and coal are used to generate electricity) [1], I am very skeptical of anti-nuclear studies, and until proven otherwise, assume they are written by activists working backwards from the conclusion they want to reach. For another example of this "logic", look at Why the nuclear phase-out was the enabler of the energy transition [2] - the "why" turns out to be because the government increased funding to wind and solar at the same time as it shut down nuclear. In other words, there is no causal link. [1] https://public.substack.com/p/anti-nuke-greens-menace-europe https://public.substack.com/p/anti-nuke-greens-menace-europe [2] https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/qa-why-germany-phasing-out-nuclear-power-and-why-now https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/qa-why-germany-phasing-...