To explain the underwhelmed response I guess most people were expecting ’google maps quality’ 3d models. Which is not an unreasonable expectation, given an aeri

To explain the underwhelmed response I guess most people were expecting ’google maps quality’ 3d models. Which is not an unreasonable expectation, given an aerial platform such as a drone converting photos to 3d models of large areas is commoditized. Just dump photos to an application such as Agisoft Metashape or Luma, wait a bit and you can get something like this for example: https://skfb.ly/6DvVP https://skfb.ly/6DvVP