3 ms·

> the only purpose for publishing someone's home address, place of employment, phone number, etc. I do not recall seeing those in the threads I looked at (whic

> the only purpose for publishing someone's home address, place of employment, phone number, etc. I do not recall seeing those in the threads I looked at (which all have an opening post collecting information about the individual). Can you confirm what proportion, if any, of main posts had that info? Can you also confirm that KF does not have a policy of removing that info? I can't access kiwifarms at the moment to check, but I strongly suspect that information is in obscure posts by individuals and their "community" as a whole does not condone it and it is removed where obvious. Edit: I have now accessed the site and confirm a culture of doxxing, with 3 of the 10 opening posts proudly having "doxx" sections.

chonkerz 3y ago
You aren't looking very hard
- concordDance 3y ago
  Give me some numbers and methodology. You apparently have access to the site, pick the ten top threads about people and tell us how many many post addresses, phone numbers or emails on the first page. Edit: I went through the hassle of figuring out how to get on that website. I can confirm 2 or the five pages I checked had doxx info on them and agree that kiwifarms does not seem to have a policy against doxxing and in fact has a culture that promotes it. This is bad.
  - foldr 3y ago
    So, you learned what you could have learned from reading the Wikipedia article or any number of other secondary sources (which you were earlier insinuating could not be trusted on these points). I'm glad that you've proved to your own satisfaction that Kiwi Farms is exactly as awful as almost everyone consistently says that it is, but there might be a lesson here about not being irrationally skeptical of 'mainstream' sources.
    - concordDance 3y ago
      It is not "exactly as awful", there have been plenty of untruths and misrepresentations stated about it, both in this comment section and elsewhere. Primary sources analysed either a good methodology are by far the best way to learn about a subject.
      - chonkerz 3y ago
        You probably need to dig deeper into the kiwifarms website before you conclude things alleged about it are untrue.
  - chonkerz 3y ago
    Thank you for putting the effort in. I can't in good faith link to these people's dox in a comment here just to prove this to you. I would also get banned off this site for doing so.
    - concordDance 3y ago
      You wouldn't have had to, just reported the proportions. That would be sufficient.

chonkerz 3y ago

You aren't looking very hard

concordDance 3y ago
Give me some numbers and methodology. You apparently have access to the site, pick the ten top threads about people and tell us how many many post addresses, phone numbers or emails on the first page. Edit: I went through the hassle of figuring out how to get on that website. I can confirm 2 or the five pages I checked had doxx info on them and agree that kiwifarms does not seem to have a policy against doxxing and in fact has a culture that promotes it. This is bad.
- foldr 3y ago
  So, you learned what you could have learned from reading the Wikipedia article or any number of other secondary sources (which you were earlier insinuating could not be trusted on these points). I'm glad that you've proved to your own satisfaction that Kiwi Farms is exactly as awful as almost everyone consistently says that it is, but there might be a lesson here about not being irrationally skeptical of 'mainstream' sources.
  - concordDance 3y ago
    It is not "exactly as awful", there have been plenty of untruths and misrepresentations stated about it, both in this comment section and elsewhere. Primary sources analysed either a good methodology are by far the best way to learn about a subject.
    - chonkerz 3y ago
      You probably need to dig deeper into the kiwifarms website before you conclude things alleged about it are untrue.
- chonkerz 3y ago
  Thank you for putting the effort in. I can't in good faith link to these people's dox in a comment here just to prove this to you. I would also get banned off this site for doing so.
  - concordDance 3y ago
    You wouldn't have had to, just reported the proportions. That would be sufficient.