3 ms·
It's a consequence of freedom. If companies aren't allowed to make the decision, then you're saying the government should make the decision instead. It's one or
by chonkerz 3y ago
It's a consequence of freedom. If companies aren't allowed to make the decision, then you're saying the government should make the decision instead. It's one or the other.
There is no functional world where no one is allowed to moderate abuse, because in that world the Internet ceases to function. You don't have to like the results, but someone has to do it.
- nvm0n2 3y agoLuckily both law and politics can distinguish between conventional internet abuse like spam or hacking, and ordinary political speech.
- chonkerz 3y agoA fair amount of that is orchestrated on Kiwifarms, where hackers share leaked personal information of their victims and dissect it in creepy detail
- dmatech 3y agoThis is actually completely legal in the USA. It might be illegal if you are doing it with the stated intention of facilitating targeted harassment, but just posting personal information isn't a crime. If it were, the media would be in a lot of trouble.