4 ms·
At this point all the major solutions are using an algorithm that would probably fall under the umbrella of "Model Predictive Control" rather than a vanilla PID
by jablongo 3y ago
At this point all the major solutions are using an algorithm that would probably fall under the umbrella of "Model Predictive Control" rather than a vanilla PID controller. An absurd spate of patent trolling occurred back in the early 2000s related to Controller definitions like these though. Researchers patented the use of a "PID controller in artificial pancreas systems" [1][2] which slowed down the development of APSs by many years.
The way the Supreme Court recently changed patent law [3] for software has definitely had a positive effect for APS development.
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769814/
[2] https://patents.google.com/patent/US20150306314 https://patents.google.com/patent/US20150306314
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_Intern...
- tremon 3y agoAn absurd spate of patent trolling occurred back in the early 2000s related to Controller definitions like these That's good news, right? That means that everything that people now come up with has well-documented prior art?