3 ms·
Right but your argument can't be 'it's complicated' with neither the number nor the reason you're choosing your number that way. Presumably that's why the DOI r
by pvg 3y ago
Right but your argument can't be 'it's complicated' with neither the number nor the reason you're choosing your number that way. Presumably that's why the DOI report uses 'county tax as fraction of discretionary revenue'. You're using 'number plucked from unstated reference as fraction of ?'.
- jeffbee 3y agoThe thing discussed in the article isn't a tax dedicated to one purpose, it is an ad valorem tax that is divided proportionally among the agencies. It says "$68 million a year in county property tax revenue to the county, $25 million to surrounding cities" which just isn't a lot in the context of Kern County. I thought it was easy enough to find their reports but if your search engine isn't up to the job: https://www.auditor.co.kern.ca.us/cafr https://www.auditor.co.kern.ca.us/cafr
- pvg 3y agoif your search engine isn't up to the job You're right, I should have used Google Weasel.