I found this interesting because it’s a rare case where an appellate court ruled that the police’s “qualified immunity” protection does not apply. > “The post

I found this interesting because it’s a rare case where an appellate court ruled that the police’s “qualified immunity” protection does not apply. > “The post did not direct any person or group to take any unlawful action immediately or in the near future,” the judges wrote. “ … at worst, his post was a joke in poor taste, but it cannot be read as intentionally directed to incitement.” > Iles violated Bailey’s First Amendment right and had no probable cause to arrest Bailey, the court said in its ruling, meaning he is not entitled to qualified immunity.