Then I think we agree more than we disagree. My objection to the simulation hypothesis is precisely that it lacks imagination. It's boring. Given all of the inf

Then I think we agree more than we disagree. My objection to the simulation hypothesis is precisely that it lacks imagination. It's boring. Given all of the infinite imaginative possibilities, that our Universe is simply an instance of our latest nerd obsession is as unlikely as its being the 6,000 year old side project of a cranky sky giant. Those two explanations come from exactly the same impulse: explaining the weird fact of our existence in terms that are reducibly familiar to us.