4 ms·
Sounds like it’s still pending: https://www.nats.aero/statement/air-traffic-control-system-update/ https://www.nats.aero/statement/air-traffic-control-system-u.
by dwroberts 3y ago
Sounds like it’s still pending: https://www.nats.aero/statement/air-traffic-control-system-update/ https://www.nats.aero/statement/air-traffic-control-system-u...
> We have well established procedures, overseen by the CAA, to investigate incidents. We are already working closely with them to provide a preliminary report to the Secretary of State for Transport on Monday. The conclusions of this report will be made public.
- Nextgrid 3y ago> Initial investigations into the problem show it relates to some of the flight data we received. Our systems, both primary and the back-ups, responded by suspending automatic processing to ensure that no incorrect safety-related information could be presented to an air traffic controller or impact the rest of the air traffic system. There are no indications that this was a cyber-attack.
- interestica 3y agoNot a cyber attack, but the way it's described makes it seem like an attack vector. (Inject bad safety data, let the cascade take it all down?)
- dwroberts 3y agoThis is the dodgy flight plan referenced by OP. A post mortem would explain in detail why there were problems with the data and exactly what they were
- sidewndr46 3y agobased on this statement it sounds like the UK's system is just a copy of ERAM as used in the US for flight planning. Enter one flight that is outside of the understood parameters and all flights need to be grounded.