> If something really is just a map or a boolean or an integer then you can't avoid this kind of thing. But usually it isn't, No matter how much you abstract o

> If something really is just a map or a boolean or an integer then you can't avoid this kind of thing. But usually it isn't, No matter how much you abstract out and dress up a boolean, at its heart it's still a boolean value and I don't see how making a custom type based on boolean would prevent returning the inverse of a boolean value bug.