2 ms·
Photographs and fingerprints don't tell you who's kids are whose.
by parineum 3y ago
Photographs and fingerprints don't tell you who's kids are whose.
- akira2501 3y agoYou don't need to capture every persons DNA for that. I'm not sure what the numbers are, but I presume there's quite a few without children at all. You also have no need to store the DNA after you've determined lineage. Who your parents are don't change later. So, a third party could perform individual verification in cases where required, and the DNA sequence itself could be destroyed afterwards by that same third party. No FBI database need exist for any of this.
- parineum 3y agoAll good points. All I was saying was why there is a need for DNA over photos and fingerprints.