3 ms·
The owner shed his Section 230 protections when he made posts directly involved in harassment of his victims that he has a personal beef with. Even the EFF's ar
by chonkerz 3y ago
The owner shed his Section 230 protections when he made posts directly involved in harassment of his victims that he has a personal beef with. Even the EFF's article says the site is full of crime and called on the cops to prosecute. This also means they won't defend your beloved website in court.
- richbell 3y ago> The owner shed his Section 230 protections when he made posts directly involved in harassment of his victims that he has a personal beef with. That's an interesting legal theory. > Even the EFF's article says the site is full of crime and called on the cops to prosecute. This also means they won't defend your beloved website in court. An organization making a claim is not evidence of the claim being true.
- chonkerz 3y ago>An organization making a claim is not evidence of the claim being true. Only the claims you like are claims you will accept as true
- richbell 3y ago> Only the claims you like are claims you will accept as true My personal feelings are irrelevant. I judge claims based on the veracity of their evidence, as should everyone.