>If so, the 1.1 billion is not running costs, but capital spent to renew parts of the plant, replace some parts and so on That would explain it. Thanks for the

>If so, the 1.1 billion is not running costs, but capital spent to renew parts of the plant, replace some parts and so on That would explain it. Thanks for the data point. > Your point about solar is well made. That's actually somebody else's point, not mine. :)