> More importantly, this is supported by case law, today. The Supreme Court ruling was not on using religion as an excuse not to serve. Supreme Court ruling wa

> More importantly, this is supported by case law, today. The Supreme Court ruling was not on using religion as an excuse not to serve. Supreme Court ruling was an about the commission violating a rule on religious neutrality. It set no precedent for the substance of the original suit. > I would bet a significant amount that if an electric company didn't want to serve a biker bar on religious grounds (particularly if there was active criminal activity), they probably would get away with it. You would be wrong. Electricity is not “creating expression”, which is what the lower courts were ruling on.