4 ms·
My hypothesis is that they want to get the absolute mindshare and adoption and decide the right product/solutions along the way. Note that there are trends (web
by bg24 3y ago
My hypothesis is that they want to get the absolute mindshare and adoption and decide the right product/solutions along the way. Note that there are trends (web 1, web 2, mobile etc.) and the leaders tend to grow significantly.
It is a mad rush time with the new generation of AI, and future products are going to be amazing. Meta cannot afford to have just 1 cash cow. Metaverse failed, but they have a real shot here.
A few things I can think of (beyond social networks).
- Enterprise push, starting with very high-end enterprises. Their license structure (free below X million users) allows it nicely. They can afford to have a small team and yet win big. Note that typically 80% of any enterprise products revenue comes from say, 10-20% of top customers.
- Build a platform. Meta learned from Google, and then Apple debacle on how dependent the world is on platform. What would the new OS look like?
- Weaken Google and Apple. Some indications on why they partnered with Microsoft - this also ties to the point above.
- patapong 3y agoI believe attracting AI talent could also be an important motivation. Many AI researchers may appreciate the open nature of their work, and having world-class AI researchers could be very important strategically for Meta.