> My guess would be pornography. Sexually explicit "meetings" wouldn't even be a particularly surprising use case, and 18 USC 2257 has a bunch of carve-outs fo

> My guess would be pornography. Sexually explicit "meetings" wouldn't even be a particularly surprising use case, and 18 USC 2257 has a bunch of carve-outs for service providers. My suspicion is that there was CSAM or similarly abhorrent content being broadcast in meetings. Unfortunately, this is a class of users which would be drawn to a service which promised anonymity and E2E encryption.