10 ms·
Not the person that you asked but I think they’re full of it. Maybe they like to believe that the American government is powerful enough to control beings in po
by sixstringtheory 3y ago
Not the person that you asked but I think they’re full of it. Maybe they like to believe that the American government is powerful enough to control beings in possession of technology capable of interstellar travel. I don’t buy it.
Or the cheese is just sliding off their cracker. Happens to many otherwise very bright folks.
- spondylosaurus 3y agoI always think about how Ben Carson was one of the most skilled (if not the most skilled) neurosurgeons in the world, so knowledgeable about the human brain and so deft at operating on it that he was able to separate conjoined twins in a then-unprecedented procedure... and is also a creationist who believes that the Egyptian pyramids were biblical grain silos.
- istjohn 3y agoLinus Pauling is another example. The only person to ever receive two unshared Nobel prizes, considered one of the top 20 scientists of all time, and he was a huge proponent of megavitamin pseudoscience.
- spondylosaurus 3y agoOh man, I forgot about Pauling... another victim of Nobel disease: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease
- defrost 3y agoYet another disease not directly susceptible to deworming. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin#History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin#History
- waihtis 3y ago"Nobel prize winner and superior neurosurgeon criticized as quacks by two internet users" Perhaps the reason they could stretch their domain expertise so far was precisely because they kept their mind open. "Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world." - Einstein
- defrost 3y agoDo please try and avoid (deliberate?) bad paraphrasing. Both were widely recognised as more than a bit kooky outside of their core strengths. "When a mind is opened that far, the brain often falls out." - Tim Minchin.
- waihtis 3y agoYou are making exactly the same point I was making. * sans the quote from a random comedian
- defrost 3y agoBut Pauling didn't successfully "stretch his domain expertise" to vitamin supplements anymore than Carson stretched his to Egyptology. Not to mention Einstein's work as a comedian never really took off.
- waihtis 3y agoEither you're trolling or your comprehension is just totally off, but to reiterate the original point was that making breakthroughs in sciences often requires "leaps of faith", which are near impossible to do if you're a textbook rationalist. I didn't make any claims about their domain expertise being cross-domain.
- maxbond 3y agoAs a neutral observer, my read on this is that they are not trolling or misreading. Their comments seem relevant and accurate. > I didn't make any claims about their domain expertise being cross-domain Maybe you have a different understanding of "cross domain," but they represented what you said fairly. > Perhaps the reason they could stretch their domain expertise so far was precisely because they kept their mind open. (Emphasis added.)
- junofan 3y agoYeah but wasn’t Grusch at the NRO investigating UAP? Seems like whistleblowing on UAP is within his domain expertise.
- s5300 3y ago>> that he was able to separate conjoined twins in a then-unprecedented procedure... Didn’t the twins like. Die? This is always brought up. Ben Carson separating twins. But like. They died. Multiple sets of conjoined people he operated on died I think. Why do people always bring this up without mentioning that the twins died To the best of my knowledge Ben Carson is and always has been a giant self aggrandizing douche who definitely has and had equals in his field
- maxbond 3y agoAccording to Wikipedia[1], one of them did survive (but was "profoundly disabled" and "never learned to speak or feed himself") but yeesh, it doesn't seem like a huge success, and their mother regrets electing for the surgery - which makes it seem like the doctors believed they would have survived and lived a reasonably normal life (under the circumstances) without the surgery. If that's the case, then it seems like a total ethical violation to even offer the surgery. But maybe that isn't so and it's her trauma talking there, I don't really know. Carson's Wikipedia article [2] mentions several other sets of twins, one operation resulting in a "normal neurological state," 2 resulting in the death of both twins, and another resulting in one dying and the other being "legally blind and [struggling] to walk." I don't know what to make of all that, but you're right, that is more murky than the narrative I've heard previously. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_and_Benjamin_Binder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_and_Benjamin_Binder [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Carson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Carson
- spondylosaurus 3y agoI know with the Iranian twins who died (adult conjoined sisters), they were advised that it was a super risky procedure but wanted to go through with it anyway. Some of the other twins he's operated on had mixed results (i.e., one twin thrived but the other didn't, or both only lived a few years after being separated), but I think at least a few pairs have done pretty well. My understanding is that separating craniopagus twins has a pretty high risk of complication/failure, even when you know what you're doing. I also know for a fact that Carson's pioneered hemispherectomy as treatment for severe childhood seizures, and some of those kids are now happy and healthy adults: https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/jessie-hall-medical-miracle-half-brain-removed-johns-hopkins/ https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/jessie-hall-medical-m... Don't get me wrong, I don't like the guy as a politician. But he knows his way around a brain.
- adolph 3y ago> . . . Ben Carson was one of the most skilled (if not the most skilled) neurosurgeons in the world . . . and is also a creationist who believes that the Egyptian pyramids were biblical grain silos. There is something to be said about applying Gell-Mann amnesia more broadly than journalism alone. In a speech in 2002, Crichton coined the term "Gell-Mann amnesia effect", after physicist Murray Gell-Mann. He used this term to describe the phenomenon of experts believing news articles written on topics outside of their fields of expertise, yet acknowledging that articles written in the same publication within their fields of expertise are error-ridden and full of misunderstanding. . . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Crichton#GellMannAmnesiaEffect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Crichton#GellMannAmnes...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- EdwardDiego 3y agoConspiracy theories that require large numbers of public servants working in concert effectively and stealthily, without any leaks or whistleblowers, are presumably created by people who have never worked in the public service. > Or the cheese is just sliding off their cracker. Happens to many otherwise very bright folks. IIRC, as your intelligence gets higher, the friction of your cracker lowers.
- hindsightbias 3y agoHN has taught me that Gov’t is utterly incompetent in every domain and that the MSM all a propaganda organ. Except of course when the Venn diagram of what I Want To Believe intersects.
- colordrops 3y agoManhattan Project, and many NSA projects until Snowden. You also don't know about the projects that didn't leak. You are basically saying that security clearance is worthless. It is indeed possible and there is a lot of precedent for large projects with long life spans that didn't leak. The "government" isn't a monolithic entity. It contains individuals and groups of a range of competencies.
- EdwardDiego 3y ago> Manhattan Project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Fuchs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Fuchs Won't point out all the double agents for the KGB that infested western spy agencies, (and vice versa) it's more of the same, really, and there's too many names to type. And those are only the ones we know of... But yep, the NSA is a good counterexample, however also a poor one as they primarily operate in the signals/digital space, where passive monitoring is the default, and where paper trails are far easier to not leave. As a thought experiment, extrapolate from the NSA to "the Bush administration did 9/11, jet fuel can't melt steel, it was a controlled demolition" conspiracy theory that implicitly requires government agents lining massive skyscrapers with explosives without being noticed, without anyone having a moral crisis, especially no-one in the "crash a plane allegedly filled with American citizens into a building in New York" division. And you'll quickly see how the NSA's quiet operations in the small don't scale to the level of competent and silent government required for faking a moon landing, or ensuring no-one knows about aliens amongst us etc etc.