3 ms·
My guess would be pornography. That seems like the most obvious use of a video calling service, and something that would cause them to run afoul of various lega
by zootboy 3y ago
My guess would be pornography. That seems like the most obvious use of a video calling service, and something that would cause them to run afoul of various legal requirements (e.g. age verification / records keeping).
- duskwuff 3y ago> My guess would be pornography. Sexually explicit "meetings" wouldn't even be a particularly surprising use case, and 18 USC 2257 has a bunch of carve-outs for service providers. My suspicion is that there was CSAM or similarly abhorrent content being broadcast in meetings. Unfortunately, this is a class of users which would be drawn to a service which promised anonymity and E2E encryption.
- xcdzvyn 3y agoSimilar services are used for sharing revenge porn, so I absolutely believe it happens with CSAM too.