surely, the attacks from KF against public persons serves to restrict those persons’ freedom of speech. > The so-called “dark web” has plenty of deserved ill r

surely, the attacks from KF against public persons serves to restrict those persons’ freedom of speech. > The so-called “dark web” has plenty of deserved ill repute, however, so although it is resistant to censorship by Tier 1 ISPs, it is not a meaningful option for many, much less an accessible one. that’s a way too casual dismissal. consider the type of person who posts on KF for just a minute (go there yourself if you haven’t), and think if they might be way more likely than your average person to know how to use tor, a VPN, or something to obfuscate their traffic before posting to a forum where they themselves might be harassed.