4 ms·
Oh, sure. I get having it as a fallback for the rare cases. But there's stuff that performs horribly in optimal conditions. Eg, my airline has this "Login" lin
by dale_glass 3y ago
Oh, sure. I get having it as a fallback for the rare cases. But there's stuff that performs horribly in optimal conditions.
Eg, my airline has this "Login" link on the front page. If I click that, it pops up a little box, then for some bizarre reason has a "Loading..." inside that shows up for 2 seconds, then finally shows a field for username and password. This is on a 16 core CPU with a 1 Gbps fiber connection.
Like what is there even to load? It's just 2 text fields and a couple buttons!
If it's some tracking BS, well, that could be done asynchronously in the background.
I get that there still exist slow computers and bad connections, but in 99.9% of cases, there's no reason to have a visible load time on anything even relatively modern. We've long had the bandwidth to load more than anyone would care to read in 10ms, and the CPU horsepower to deal with it.