3 ms·
discussed here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37296122 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37296122 I found this comment useful: - https://news.ycombi
by michael1999 3y ago
discussed here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37296122 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37296122
I found this comment useful:
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37297963 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37297963
Several comments noted that a 4 month improvement in life expectancy (for sigmoidoscopy) over the whole population is actually pretty good for a low-incidence cancer. That's several years for the people who actually get it.
But the comments seem naive about the downsides of broad screening: over-treatment, iatrogenic disease, false positives, opportunity cost, etc.
- dang 3y ago(this comment was originally posted to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37312540 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37312540, but we've merged that thread hither. that's why the comment links to its own thread now)