Chicago's metropolitan area has around 10 million people in it. Are you saying that a cyclist killed every third day with that kind of population is considered

Chicago's metropolitan area has around 10 million people in it. Are you saying that a cyclist killed every third day with that kind of population is considered an acceptable loss? Edit: for context, NYC alone has a comparable population (versus the entire Chicago MSA) and, despite rising cyclist deaths, still has significantly fewer than ~120 a year[1]. Edit: TFA's source for cycling deaths appears to be incorrect; the actual rate is far below ~120/year. The ~120/year number appears to come from a misreading of total pedestrian and cycling deaths in this report[2]. [1]: https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2023/08/07/cyclist-deaths-are-surging-in-nyc https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2023/08/07/cyclist-deaths-are-su... [2]: https://activetrans.org/sites/files/crash%20report%202018%20V3.pdf https://activetrans.org/sites/files/crash%20report%202018%20...