4 ms·
Yeah, I think that was the point that they COULDN'T contact the "expert who wrote the book" because they couldn't exist and then ZeroGPT was the one-two punch t
by soupfordummies 3y ago
Yeah, I think that was the point that they COULDN'T contact the "expert who wrote the book" because they couldn't exist and then ZeroGPT was the one-two punch to "prove" it was AI.
That said, MY biggest takeaway from the article was "Hm, ZeroGPT, wonder how that works?"
- andybak 3y agoIt mostly doesn't. There's a huge controversy any tools like this being used to accuse students of using AI and the false positive rate is bad.
- soupfordummies 3y agoYeah a quick look on their (ZeroGPT) website and it seems like it's basically just a model itself trained on human vs. AI text? It caught what I tested with 100% accuracy but I didn't spend more than a few minutes playing with it.