3 ms·
By comparative pricing, if this is an equivalent of ChatGPT Enterprise + Plugins, you can take the ChatGPT plus pricing which is public at $20/user/mo and this
by vasco 3y ago
By comparative pricing, if this is an equivalent of ChatGPT Enterprise + Plugins, you can take the ChatGPT plus pricing which is public at $20/user/mo and this doesn't look that bad.
Assuming business user features and SLAs + deep integration with all of your google workspace are worth the additional $10/user/mo, doesn't sound that bad for a "today" price and until someone undercuts this.
I think they're actually either signaling they think Bard is less good than ChatGPT with this pricing, or they really wanted to undercut ChatGPT enterprise as early as possible, because althought I haven't seen OpenAI's private pricing I doubt they'd be selling for under $30/m, and you'll have way more work trying to piece together plugins and paying 3rd party vendors to replicate "summarize this google drive folder for me into a slide deck" type stuff.
- LordDragonfang 3y agoYeah, but Google's LLMs are notoriously bad compared to even the free tier of ChatGPT, unless I've missed something.
- evanextreme 3y agoBard has certainly become better over the past few months, and while as a product it is worse in some ways (seems to have a purposefully low understanding of the previous context in a chat) it is up to date with somewhat current information, unlike GPT where you need to pay money to access its web browsing capabilities.
- zer0c00ler 3y ago[dead]
- TX81Z 3y agoI want to use the best tool and every time there is a Bard update I fire up it and try my last few GPT queries and not once have I had reason to switch. I will switch the second it is better, but for the coding tasks I need done GPT is improving rapidly and Bard is just falling further behind. At some point I’ll stop comparing unless I hear of some crazy breakthrough.