The personal benefits of WFH are obvious to the individual employee: no commute, the ability to live wherever you want instead of obscenely expensive areas like

The personal benefits of WFH are obvious to the individual employee: no commute, the ability to live wherever you want instead of obscenely expensive areas like Silicon Valley, spending more time with your family, flexible work hours. How exactly is it "groupthink" to prefer this? The question is, why exactly do executives prefer RTO? They seem to be rather short on evidence of the benefits.