If I'm understanding what she reported, Booz was losing $XX on commercial contracts and billing $XX excess on government contracts. There was a direct link bet

If I'm understanding what she reported, Booz was losing $XX on commercial contracts and billing $XX excess on government contracts. There was a direct link between the two, which is prohibited. And her case was strong enough that the government decided to pursue it. That doesn't always happen - whistleblowers sometimes have to pursue these cases on their own (crazy as that sounds to me).