4 ms·

Thanks for your feedback. As I previously said in another comment, the article was written in one go and I probably have missed the point of "be minimal in the

Thanks for your feedback. As I previously said in another comment, the article was written in one go and I probably have missed the point of "be minimal in the description". I felt that readers should know a little bit more about obfuscations techniques, their use and why these are deployed into prod. While I am writing, I tend more to be "story-teller" to immerge readers into the flow, but I do admit this article is really difficult to read. I even deleted some paragraphs because it was going to be huge.

t8sr 3y ago
Hello, and thank you for talking about your work. Real stories from the industry like this are awesome to have. As a fellow infosec person, I also struggle with keeping things brief. (Especially since I started out in digital forensics, where you can be extremely verbose.) It's counter to the inclination we have to checking every detail, I think. But I've found that I get 10x more people engaging with a 2-pager than a 10-pager. One of the things that really helps me is http://plainlanguage.gov http://plainlanguage.gov.
- nicolodev 3y ago
  Thanks for the feedback again. I did really appreciate it. Oh the website you mentioned seems interesting, especially for a person that does not speak English daily. I'll keep in mind, and of course I bookmarked it.