4 ms·
It is sort of the opposite. The people with remote contracts aren't affected by this. It is the people who have contracts that list a work location but who have
by UncleMeat 3y ago
It is sort of the opposite. The people with remote contracts aren't affected by this. It is the people who have contracts that list a work location but who have been working remotely anyway because of workplace flexibility who are affected. Yes, it is a crappy situation and workplace flexibility should be way way way more common but it isn't laying off remote staff.
- Civil7598 3y agoNope. All of us with "Remote (State)" are told to move or quit. We had exceptions by VPs but are now told we need to get CEO or HR exceptions.
- bradjohnson 3y ago> The people with remote contracts aren't affected by this. False. I currently work at Amazon and was hired remotely, as per my employment contract, and I've been forced to relocate or resign.