4 ms·
> No, the USSR was a big grown up country governed by people that understood the difference... So to rephrase it: never trust NATO's word. > The standard for
by pastacacioepepe 3y ago
> No, the USSR was a big grown up country governed by people that understood the difference...
So to rephrase it: never trust NATO's word.
> The standard for notes is to provide relevant context.
And I say it is relevant. NATO claims to be strictly a defensive alliance, the note adds contextual information to show that NATO is both expanding and waging wars of aggression.
What can be more relevant than that?
- jnsaff2 3y agohttps://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1696112669755904014 https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/16961126697559040...
- dragonwriter 3y ago> So to rephrase it: never trust NATO's word. If “trust” to you means “invent application far beyond the context to which a commitment applies”, sure, otherwise, no, that’s not a rephrase.