4 ms·
Do I have to build something comparable to be able to comment on the performance issues I have witnessed? I don't think so. Do I have to accept all those excus
by RNAlfons 3y ago
Do I have to build something comparable to be able to comment on the performance issues I have witnessed? I don't think so.
Do I have to accept all those excuses, which like those pictures of ships never run low in this company, to comment on the performance? I don't think so.
They promise a lot. They don't deliver. They break things which were already working and I'm still waiting. Those are clear signs of terrible Project Management and I think, I don't have to know all those cool insiders-excuses to be able to comment on this failure.
So please. Spare me your epigrams. They won't change anything about the facts.
- BowBun 3y ago[flagged]
- mynameisvlad 3y ago> I'm sure you can think of examples in your own life where something you respected was judged from a moment in time. More like 10 years in time. We've long passed "a moment" of promises and underdelivery. > I know you now have no choice but to double down in bravado because we're on the internet, but it is what it is. This is projection at its finest, considering you have to justify actual money being put into a project that has not really delivered on promises for a decade now.
- BowBun 3y ago[flagged]
- dang 3y agoPlease don't respond to a bad comment by breaking the site guidelines yourself. That only makes things worse. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- dang 3y agoHey, please don't take HN threads further into flamewar. Your reply here is a noticeable drop hellward, and that's what we're trying to avoid here! https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html