3 ms·

Sure, but the fastest Elixir-based entry on that list has half the score of uvicorn (Python), so not really sure what your point is here w.r.t. OP.

• brd529 3y ago
  Reading higher in the thread, some Elixir folks are saying that the techempower benchmarks used the wrong settings (debug mode, etc) for their Elixir benchmark.
  • amarshall 3y ago
    Though that doesn’t change the crux of my question (rather it reinforces it): why invoke that benchmark in this context at all?
    • winter_blue 3y ago
      The fastest Elixir framework on the list, phoenix, is about as fast as uvicorn. (Both around 10 times slower than dragon.) I was mostly responding directly to these 2 statements from my parent comment: > They did savings by re-implementing their services and attribute those savings to the new tool / programming language. > I wonder what the saving would look like if they chose another tool for the second / optimized system. I doubt it would differ much if they went with Go, Java or stayed with Python. Which I didn't entirely agree with.