4 ms·
QA needs to be paid. Largely nobody is doing QA as a passion. As for UX, if these are the same wizards working around Windows/mobile/web, then please keep them
by zb10948 3y ago
QA needs to be paid. Largely nobody is doing QA as a passion.
As for UX, if these are the same wizards working around Windows/mobile/web, then please keep them away by all means necessary.
- gumballindie 3y agoQA needs to be paid as does programming. I imagine some people have a passion for it and could build automated qa tools around open source products. Say a gui tool that automates clicks on kde or gnome widgets. That would be quite a challenge in itself. As for ux, open source is not a job. Ux folks are told my product managers to enshitify things on daily basis. I imagine open source can provide a safe haven form all that and let people run wild beautiful ux and uis. Imagine someone working on the ux of a linux distro aimed at making onboarding of casual users easier. Imagine a group of people putting together a nice set of guidelines for ui and ux similar to how apple has guidelines. I think these are two areas where linux (distros) have gaps.
- zb10948 3y agoThe simple part is UX people working with UX stuff, such as GTK or QT themes. The hard to impossible part is getting a typical open source UNIX desktop to look and behave as cohesive as Windows or Mac. It's a technology issue and not an asset issue. As for beautiful UIs QT has made a step forward with the Qt Quick and Qt Designer which allow a more UX workflow for the UI as opposed to old school dialog/form design.