4 ms·
I’m not knowledgeable but follow the conversation on the topic. To me advanced US tech is the Occam’s razor explanation. If there is new advanced tech, it wou
by kcplate 3y ago
I’m not knowledgeable but follow the conversation on the topic. To me advanced US tech is the Occam’s razor explanation.
If there is new advanced tech, it would likely be US in origin just given the amount of money the US has spent over the last 70 years for defense. It certainly makes sense that we would compartmentalize advanced tech knowledge and it makes sense that we might test it on ourselves to gauge/control reaction to the tech rather than risk it falling into another government’s hands.
And yes, of course our government would lie about it. Why wouldn’t they?
- david-gpu 3y agoFor me the biggest challenge to the idea of it being secret US tech is the testimony of high-ranking folks like Dave Grusch and Karl Nell. What do you make of that? Another counterargument you often hear is the decades-long historical record from pilots (both civilian and military), including reports of "Foo fighters" during WW2 from both sides of the conflict. It is a muddy subject.
- kcplate 3y ago> Dave Grusch and Karl Nell My understanding is that Grusch has not testified that he had direct knowledge/eyewitness/evidence to alien tech, but instead “has been told of…” from people who have. Nell simply vouches for Grusch’s integrity and adds no direct evidence right? That said, despite all the latest publicity we don’t really know anymore now than we did before. Still zero actual evidence and honestly nothing that hasn’t already been out there for decades: “blue beret” crash retrieval units, Colonel Corso, Lazar, Jesse Marcel. All we have that is different is a person willing to testify to congress that he heard some rumors and a congress willing to hear it.