> but the other is our using something we are not authorized to use because the tool has it already in its data. We won't know if this is legally sound until a

> but the other is our using something we are not authorized to use because the tool has it already in its data. We won't know if this is legally sound until a company who isn't forbidding A.I. usage gets sued and they claim this as a defense. For all we know the court could determine that, as long as the content isn't directly regurgitated, it's seen as fair use of the input data.