4 ms·
Shouldn't that burden be on the company? If they're shifting the working model, which is a major upheaval for those affected, shouldn't they cite some clear fac
by dividefuel 3y ago
Shouldn't that burden be on the company? If they're shifting the working model, which is a major upheaval for those affected, shouldn't they cite some clear facts or research on why? It seems like all I've seen is platitudes about the magic of working together face-to-face, rather than hard data.
I would think the steelman for WFH is the significant number of employees who clearly prefer it.
- sokoloff 3y agoIs it good for the employee and good for the company, good for the employee and neutral for the company, or good for the employee and bad for the company? In all those cases, I'd expect employees to prefer it, but I can see the company having quite different views across the various scenarios. For myself, I thought I'd absolutely hate working from home full-time. It turns out I love it. I don't think it's obviously good for the company, but I'm not sure how bad vs neutral vs epsilon-positive it is.