4 ms·
The copyright ruling that you are referencing is being significantly misunderstood. The only think that the ruling said is basically that the most low effort v
by stale2002 3y ago
The copyright ruling that you are referencing is being significantly misunderstood.
The only think that the ruling said is basically that the most low effort version of AI does not have copyright protection.
IE, if you just go into midjourney and type in "super cool anime girl!" and thats it, the results are not protected.
But there is so much more you can do. For example, you can generate an image, and then change it. The resulting images would be protected due to you adding the human input to it.
- happytiger 3y agoMy understanding is that there are many more issues across both the training data and the output. https://www.theverge.com/23444685/generative-ai-copyright-infringement-legal-fair-use-training-data https://www.theverge.com/23444685/generative-ai-copyright-in... https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-facing-another-copyright-suit-over-ai-training-on-novels https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-facing-another-c... Etc…
- stale2002 3y agoNone of what you posted has been settled by any court. It is all a hypothetical issue that has not been enforced as of yet.