> What reason do you have to believe that the author was not rigorous in coming to his conclusions? The arguments provided in the article. I quoted them for yo

> What reason do you have to believe that the author was not rigorous in coming to his conclusions? The arguments provided in the article. I quoted them for your convenience. > What "peer-reviewed" Why the quotes? I haven't mentioned peer review once. > You sound like "authoritative" government institutions stating that "UFOs don't exist" UFOs as in "unidentified flying objects" obviously exist. Nobody denies that. What people deny is aliens visiting Earth and us either not noticing, or covering it up. > I can only link you to my earlier comment which isn't going down too well here. Your comment makes no sense. There's attacking the person, there's attacking the person's family, and then there's this. I'd call this "argument from institutional multi-generational hypocrisy". If your country was created by people who believed in slavery - you can't be against slavery. I can't even. Fascinating POV. BTW many universities weren't even set up by church. For example the one I graduated (UMCS in Poland).