Yeah, I’d beg to differ there. Non-const references have all the non-nullable benefits over pointer-to-non-const as const references have over pointer-to-const

Yeah, I’d beg to differ there. Non-const references have all the non-nullable benefits over pointer-to-non-const as const references have over pointer-to-const. While I’d prefer a call-site syntax difference similar to what Rust has, the non-null ability of references is well worth it.