3 ms·

Totally agree about Gitorious, but I think it'd be wise to support GitHub (and Bitbucket) as they are used by a large chunk of people.

• dfc 15y ago
  "wise to support github"? What does that mean? Github is not some function/feature that you support?
  • sirclueless 15y ago
    Basically, responding to Github issues and pull requests gives access to a whole wealth of people who use Github to communicate and collaborate.
    • dfc 15y ago
      So in order to "support github and bitbucket" you have to keep copies of your project at both sites? That makes less sense than the original post. The OP uses and when including bitbucket the only way your explanation of "support github" makes sense is with "or bitbucket."
      • stevelosh 15y ago
        > So in order to "support github and bitbucket" you have to keep copies of your project at both sites? Yes. It's not difficult and means you can accept pull requests from both Mercurial and Git users. https://bitbucket.org/sjl/gundo.vim/src https://bitbucket.org/sjl/gundo.vim/src https://github.com/sjl/gundo.vim https://github.com/sjl/gundo.vim
        • dfc 15y ago
          And separate issue/ticket systems? Do you do it for the LOLZ?
  • apgwoz 15y ago
    The point that the article makes is that OddMuse makes a horrible project hosting system. It's easy enough to store a link to github, or bitbucket, or gitorious (and in all reality, they all speak git, so it's just another remote) as the official project location in whatever new wiki-system emerges.